The bitter truth we all know that somehow human beings will lose their jobs and robots will take over the world. Artificial Intelligence is already in play an important role in everyone’s life, but in the future is it going to be safe? Recently Microsoft made a decision to fire dozens of its journalists who were responsible for selecting, curating, and editing articles for the MSN website, with ideas to substitute them with automatic systems that shall decide news stories. But can AI actually take place of the journalists, is it safe, is it beneficial?

The economic fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic has caused an unusual crisis in journalism that would kill media organizations around the world.  AI refers “to intelligent machines that learn from experience and perform tasks like humans,” consistent with Francesco Marconi, a professor of journalism at Columbia University in NY, who has just published a book on the subject: Newsmakers, AI and therefore the way forward for Journalism.

AI doesn’t replace journalists

Artificial intelligence isn’t there to exchange journalists or eliminate jobs. Marconi believes that only 8 to 12 percent of reporters’ current tasks are going to be appropriated by machines, which can actually motivate editors and journalists towards value-added content: long-form journalism, feature interviews, analysis, data-driven journalism, and investigative journalism.

At the instant, AI robots perform basic tasks like writing two to 6 paragraphs on sports scores and quarterly earnings reports at the Associated Press. The outcomes are convincing, but they also show the bounds of AI.

AI robots examining huge databases can send journalists at Bloomberg News an alarm them as soon as a trend or freak emerges from big data.

AI also can save reporters tons of time by copying audio and video interviews. Machines can analyze complex data in no time in the least.

Afterward, the journalist does his or her essential work of fact-checking, analyzing, contextualizing, and gathering information. AI can hardly replace this. During this sense, humans must remain central to the whole journalistic process.

Journalism keeps on changing with each wave of technology. Previously news was Handwritten but today it is made easy by mass printing. The wireless transmitter sped up news collection across large distances. The telephone and radio stimulated journalism even further. And in just the past 100 years, journalism moved from radio to television to cable to the internet, and in each repetition, the news business has evolved. There is no doubt that in this latest monotony, AI will change journalism even further, and will proceed to transform the way that news is created, produced, managed, published, and shared with the world.

Reference –